Supreme Court LLM Data Trainer

Visit the GitHub Repository

Stack

Here are the technologies used in this project:

R Stata PostgreSQL AWS GCP Git Firebase Python Github Pytorch Tensorflow Hugging Face

Research Summary: Key Contributions

Statistical Analysis

  • Conducted advanced statistical analyses, including:
    • Chi-squared tests.
    • Linear regression.
    • Confidence intervals.
  • Analyzed over 5,000 survey entries with 150+ variables to assess public opinion and its impact on Supreme Court decisions.

Data Visualization

  • Developed over 100 lines of code in R, Stata, and Python to create:
    • Plots.
    • Tables.
    • Diagrams.
  • Visualized relationships between:
    • Public perception and Supreme Court docket fluctuations.
    • The influence of SCOTUS decisions on policy.

Database Management

  • Structured and managed extensive databases to:
    • Analyze survey data.
    • Identify trends in SCOTUS case alignments (liberal vs. conservative).
    • Examine political beliefs among small businesses.

Research and Publications

  • Book Publication:
    • Authored and presented a research publication to a board of 10+ professors.
    • Conducted meticulous book analysis, proof writing, and academic writing.
    • Successfully released the book “Majority Opinions: How an Out-of-Step Supreme Court Can Affect the Rule of Law” with Dr. Neil Malhotra.
  • Paper Publication:
    • Collaborated on a paper with Dr. Malhotra: “The Politics of Small Business Owners.”

AI Development

  • Fine-tuned an AI model leveraging Large Language Models (LLMs) to:
    • Predict Supreme Court decisions.
    • Process over 1,500 files, including 800 court documents and personal appeals.
    • Classify cases based on specific justices.
  • Engineered Python-based SCOTUS case file data loaders for Google Cloud processors, optimizing pre-trained LLM models.

Future Directions

  • Explore deeper intersections between public opinion and judicial decisions.
  • Expand AI models to incorporate real-time data for predictive analysis.
  • Continue academic publishing to further the understanding of SCOTUS’s influence on policy and public sentiment.